‘Marijuana’, the excitement surrounding this word is enormous. ‘Ganja’, ‘charas’, ‘bhang’ are some popular forms of marijuana available, two out of three being illegal and the third being sold only at government authorized outlets. The question of whether marijuana is harmful is debatable, but truly interesting because of the variety of takes people have on it! The most popular being, ‘Why is there a need to illegalize it in a country where tobacco and alcohol are extensively consumed?’.
The story dates back to 1930s USA where hemp was once extensively used to make paper, essential oils, furniture, construction material, fodder ,clothes and also used for recreational purposes and so much more. It is believed that since this one “billion dollar plant”, which could be easily grown in abundance and was so inexpensive, could pose a huge threat to the growing liquor, timber and, the then newly founded, synthetic and plastic industries. A theory suggests that the fact that corporate industries had a lot to lose from hemp competition, and hence motivated the media to encourage the propaganda around the ‘reefer madness hysteria’, and utilized their influence to lobby for the banning of marijuana.
India had been battling American pressure since 1961 to keep marijuana legal. Since 1961, the US has been campaigning for a global law against all drugs, both hard and soft. Given that ganja, charas and bhang were a way of life in India, officials opposed the drastic measure. But by the early '80s, American society was grappling with some drug problems and opinion had grown against the "excesses" of the hippie generation. Therefore, in 1985, the Rajiv Gandhi government buckled under the pressure and enacted a law called the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.
Many supporters of hemp argue why the act is still prevalent (or not amended), especially after we now know of its many science backed benefits today. Marijuana is proven to be useful as a less expensive cancer treating drug, has depression reducing and pain killing properties along with being a lot less harmful than alcohol or tobacco.
One of the most prominent reasons for not uplifting the ban allegedly is the amount of revenue earned by the govt. via letting the liquor and tobacco companies run their business in our country. This cartel exercises its influence to not let a safer and cheaper competition enter the market for they are bound to lose. In addition, government tax on weed is bound to generate nominal revenue as it is way cheaper than alcohol.
We live in an era full of scams and conspiracies, nobody is sure of what to believe. Good is subjective and people voice their opinions on every possible thing. Weed has had a bad reputation, but does this need to change? I leave this to you.