Oct 25,2019 | 15 min read

Litigation Process And Asset Distribution Under IBC

Autor - Advocate Vikas Mehta Associate Zarmeen Jahan

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 ("Code") was instituted so as to unite and alter the laws identifying with rearrangement and indebtedness goals of corporate people, constrained risk organizations, association firms and people in a period headed way for augmentation of estimation of advantages of such people, to advance business enterprise, accessibility of credit and equalization the premiums of the considerable number of partners.

Litigation Process

Under the Code, the liabilities of an organization have been arranged under three board classifications, that is; monetary liabilities which depend on money-related agreements; operational liabilities which depend on operational agreements; and statutory liabilities which are amounts payable to government offices/specialists. The Code conceives inception of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ("CIRP") by the National Company Law Tribunal (Adjudicating Authority) on an application made by the corporate indebted person or operational bank. Monetary banks are those whose association with the element is an unadulterated budgetary agreement, for example, an advance or an obligation security, though the operational loan bosses are those whose risk from the substance originates from exchange on tasks. The Code separates between money related loan bosses and operational leasers since their liabilities emerge from various fundamental agreements.

The initial phase in a corporate bankruptcy goals procedure is to endeavour every conceivable exertion to resuscitate and restart the corporate individual. This is generally done by getting ready and implementing a 'goals plan'. Nonetheless, if that doesn't work out, the procedure that pursues is liquidation. Where a goals plan endorsed by the Adjudicating Authority is contradicted by the corporate indebted person, any individual other than the corporate account holder, whose interests are preferentially influenced by such repudiation, may make an application to the Adjudicating Authority for a liquidation request. On the off chance that the arbitrating authority discovers that the corporate indebted person has, in reality, negated the goals plan, it will pass a liquidation request.

For the motivations behind liquidation, the outlet will shape a domain of the benefits which will be known as the liquidation bequest in connection to the corporate debtor. The outlet will hold the liquidation domain as a trustee to support every one of the loan bosses. Segment 38 of the Code gives that the vendor will get or gather the cases of loan bosses inside a time of thirty days from the date of the beginning of the liquidation procedure and a lender may pull back or differ his case under this segment inside fourteen days of its accommodation.

From that point, the vendor will confirm the cases submitted inside such timespan as might be endorsed by the IBBI. Segment 40 of the Code gives that the outlet may, after the check of cases under Section 39, either concede or dismiss the case, in entire or to some extent, all things considered. It is additionally given that where the vendor dismisses a case, he will record recorded as a hard copy of the purposes behind such dismissal. The outlet must impart his choice of affirmation or dismissal of cases to the lender and corporate borrower inside seven days of such confirmation or dismissal of cases. The liquidator shall file the asset memorandum along with the preliminary report to the Adjudicating Authority. The asset memorandum shall not be accessible to any person during liquidation unless permitted by the Adjudicating Authority.

Distribution of Assets

The outlet will not start distribution before the rundown of partners and the advantage notice has been documented with the Adjudicating Authority. The vendor will convey the returns from acknowledgement inside ninety days from the receipt of the sum to the partners. The indebtedness goals procedure costs, assuming any, and the liquidation expenses will be deducted before such circulation is made. The outlet will apply to the Adjudicating Authority for a request to pay into the Companies Liquidation Account in the Public Account of India any unclaimed continues of liquidation or undistributed resources or some other equalization payable to the partners in his grasp on the date of the request for disintegration. It is additionally given that any vendor who holds any cash which ought to have been paid by him into the Companies Liquidation Account under this Regulation will pay enthusiasm on the sum held at the pace of twelve per cent for every annum, and furthermore pay such punishment as might be controlled by the Board.


The Code is a one-stop answer for settling bankruptcies which recently was a long procedure that didn't offer a monetarily practical plan. The code intends to ensure the premiums of little speculators and make the way toward working together less awkward.

Need Free Legal Advice or Assistance Online?

For any Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law (IBC) related matter, please Post Your Requirement anonymously and get free proposals OR find the Best Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law (IBC) Lawyers and book a free appointment directly.


Consumer Protection Act 2019: A Comprehensive Analysis

Monthly Legal Bulletin September 2020

Template for Term Sheet

Employment During The Times Of Covid 19 By Darpa Pattnaik

Anticipatory Bail In The Indian Context By Ayantika Mondal

“Life of a Lawyer Living With The Covid Beast" By Advocate T S Sarath

Not Heard About CESTAT??

Software Maintenance Agreement

Partnership Dissolution Agreement


Vikas Mehta

Vikas Mehta is an Advocate-on.-Record in the Supreme Court of India since October, 2004 and has practiced for about 17 years at the bar.He is well versed with Corporate Laws including issues pertaining to Mergers and Acquisitions, and Joint Venture Agreements. He also has a complete grip on the subject of Civil and Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India