Nov 20,2020 | 5 min read

"Divorce By Mutual Consent" By Kawaljit Singh Bhatia

Co-Author: Aditi Das

INTRODUCTION

Marriage has continuously been considered as a sacred relationship in each religion around the world. It is said that connections are made in paradise, and couples fair meets each other on the soil. It isn't fair to have a relationship between two individuals, but a relationship between two diverse families. Two distinctive individuals from two distinctive families come together to urge each other to hitchhike and begin an unused family. At any rate, marriage is still an agreement, and like all other shapes of understandings, it can moreover be brought to a conclusion. In this article, we are planning to bargain with the Hindu Marriage Act, particularly how-to conclude a marriage by shared assent as per the Act.

DIVORCE UNDER HINDU LAW

If marriage solemnized under the Hindu Marriage Act is valid, and there is a reason to end it – it can be ended by way of either Judicial Separation under Section 10 or Divorce under Section 13 and Section 13B. Section 13 A provides alternate reliefs in divorce proceedings. 

GROUNDS FOR JUDICIAL SEPARATION AND DIVORCE:

  • Adultery: has sexual intercourse with any other person than their spouse.

  • Cruelty: treats their spouse with cruel behaviour.

  • Desertion: has left their spouse for a period of at least two years without any reasonable grounds.

  • Conversion: has converted to some other religion.

  • Insanity: suffers from any mental disorder. 

  • Leprosy: suffers from an incurable and contagious disease.

  • Renounced the world: has renounced the world to unite with God or for the search of the truth.

  • Has not been heard alive for seven years.

  • Divorce by Mutual Consent: (Section 13B)

In a case where none of the aforementioned grounds is available, but the parties decide they do not want to remain married to each other or cannot live with one another they can seek divorce by mutual consent under section 13 B of the Hindu Marriage Act.

ESSENTIALS OF DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT

  1. PARTIES SHOULD BE LIVING SEPARATELY:

Section 13 B of the Act endorses that in arrange to break up a marriage commonly, the life partners ought to be living independently for a period of at slightest 1 year sometime recently recording the petition. This period of one year where the parties have lived independently must be quickly some time recently the recording of the appeal. “Living Separately” within the setting of Area 13B does not necessarily mean physically living in totally different places. The parties might be living within the same house, sharing the same roof, but there can still be a remove between the two. If that's the case, then they are not considered to be living as spouse and spouse, which qualifies as living separately.

The Hon’ble Incomparable Court held the same within the case of Suresh Devi v. Om Prakash. Wherein it was made clear that living independently does not fundamentally cruel living in completely different places. The parties can be living together but not as companions.

  1. PARTIES HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO LIVE TOGETHER: 

In Pradeep Gasp & anr v. Govt of NCT Delhi, the parties were hitched and had a girl from their wedlock. Be that as it may, due to inconsistent contrasts between them, they were not able to live together and chosen to live independently. Despite putting their best endeavours, they were incapable of accommodating their marriage and seeming not to see themselves living together as spouse and spouse ever once more. A separate request was mutually recorded, and issues such as upkeep and care of their child were chosen and concurred upon by both. The spouse would get care of their girl, and the spouse would save appearance rights; it was commonly concurred upon by both of them. Both parties gave their free assent without any undue impact.

The court watched that there was no scope of compromise and allowed a proclaim of divorce. After recording an appeal for separate by shared assent, the parties are given a holding up period of 6 months, moreover known as a cooling period, and it may expand up to 18 months. During this time, the parties must introspect and think about their decision. If the parties are still not able to live together after the cooling period, then the divorce petition shall be passed by the district judge.

  1. THEY HAVE MUTUALLY AGREED THAT MARRIAGE SHOULD BE RESOLVED:

In a few circumstances – the parties may select to donate their marriage another chance and commonly resolve their marriage. Amid the holding up period, the parties may, in some cases be able to accommodate and make their relationship work. After the primary movement has been passed, the parties have an add up of 18 months to record for moment movement, and if they fall flat to do so inside those 18 months, both parties are considered to have pulled back their assent mutually. The spouse would get care of their girl, and the spouse would save appearance rights; it was commonly concurred upon by both of them.

Both parties gave their free assent without any undue impact. The court watched that there was no scope of compromise and allowed a proclaim of divorce. After recording an appeal for separate by common assent, the parties are given a holding up period of 6 months, to known as a cooling period, and it may amplify up to 18 months.

PROCEDURES FOR DIVORCE

  1. JOINTLY FILING A PETITION

A separate appeal within the shape of a testimony is to be marked by both parties and recorded some time recently in a family court in their region. Jurisdiction of the court ought to not be a major issue in recording for separate as the appeal can be recorded inside the neighbourhood limits of the conventional gracious locale of where the marriage was solemnized or where either of the parties as of now resides. As said prior, the parties to a marriage must be living independently for at slightest one year sometime recently recording the request.

  1. FIRST MOTION

After recording the appeal, the parties might show up some time recently to the court and allow their explanations. If the court is fulfilled and the articulations are recorded at that point, the primary movement is said to have been passed, taking after which a holding up period of 6 months will be given to the parties some time recently, they can record the moment motion. This holding up period as statutorily endorsed beneath Area 13B (2) of the Act is for the parties to introspect and think about their decision. It could be a time given for them to accommodate and deliver their marriage another chance, fair in case they choose to alter their mind.

Anyhow, in some cases the court may be persuaded that the marriage has come to the point of no return and the holding up period will as it was extending their hopelessness. In that case, this period can be postponed off by the court. This period on the off chance that not postponed off can amplify up to 18 months. As said prior, the parties to a marriage must be living independently for at slightest one year sometime recently recording the request. If the parties still want to get divorced, they may now file for second motion. The second motion can be filed only after the waiting period of 6 months and before 18 months has elapsed.

  1. SECOND MOTION

This can be when last hearings take put, and explanations are recorded once more. On the off chance that the issues of a divorce settlement and child care (in case any) have commonly concurred upon the proclaim of separate is passed after this step. The marriage has at long last finished by presently and separate by shared assent has been allowed.

CONCLUSION

Separation may be a genuine issue and must be utilized as it were as a last resort, be that as it may, these days individuals don't think twice some time recently getting separated. It splits families, and the child of the isolating couple needs to go through a genuine injury, developing up with isolated guardians.

Having said all that, nations having higher separate rates have higher benchmarks of ladies strengthening. Individuals get to work out their right to choose to the conclusion the marriage on the off chance that they are not happy. Divorce by common assent is a perfect way, an ideal way to separate as the parties don't need to mouth each other within the court and both parties can commonly settle on all issues and conclude their marriage.


Need Free Legal Advice or Assistance Online?


For any Family Law related matter, please Post Your Requirement anonymously and get free proposals OR find the Best Family Law Lawyers and book a free appointment directly.


POPULAR READS

"Divorce Under Marital Laws" By Sangeetha Narayanaswamy


"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code" By Sangeetha Narayanaswamy


"Start ups Compliances" By Sangeetha Narayanaswamy


"FDI In India" By Sangeetha Narayanaswamy


"Electronic Evidence" By Anusha Vijayakumar


"Types of Cyber-crime & Cyber-laws" By Dr. Vinod Surana


"Conducting Trial In Criminal Cases" By Dilraj Rohit Senquiera


"Bail Jurisdiction Suitable For Current Indian Position In Comparison To Other Countries"


"Is Online Dispute Resolution Viable?" By Kawaljit Singh Bhatia


ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Kawaljit Singh Bhatia

Kawaljit Singh Bhatia is an Advocate on Record in the Supreme Court of India and appears regularly in the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and various Courts and Tribunals in Delhi. Singh specializes in the field of Arbitration, Commercial Disputes, Consumer Disputes, Telecom & Broadcasting Laws, etc. Singh has, in the past, worked with top tier firms like Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas and Trilegal. Singh is an alumni of Symbiosis Law School, Pune - batch of 2009.

MORE IN BUSINESS