One has to start by understanding why you are the A-1 in this case. Without a copy of the FIR, a detailed description of the nature of your work, details of your interactions with the complainants or alleged victims, particulars about the the nature of your relationship with the proprietors/owners of the Consultancy firm etc., no effective assistance can be provided.
Going by the limited information provided, things that might be relevant could include: 1. whether there is any evidence to show that you being a mere employee/commissioned agent, could have been the mastermind of this alleged racket- without any substantive evidence to directly link it might be difficult to make you the main accused; 2. the total income you have generated from your association with the consultancy firm- if you have only made a modest amount of money which is relatable to your commission and there is no seizure of any cash from you or discovery of any unusual financial activity, it might be difficult to prosecute you as the main accused. You may bring these facts to the attention of the IO. In the absence of more details and the relevant documents, the possibility and feasibility of resorting to other appropriate remedies under the law cannot be examined.